The Oscars
Mar. 6th, 2006 01:41 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I haven't posted in a while...I've been a pretty busy. Crazy busy.
I only want to say the following. I watched the Oscars with the Gang (the school gang) last night. I don't know how I feel about Crash winning the Best Picture Oscar...since I haven't seen it yet. Brokeback was good, but I didn't think it was the most brilliant picture ever...something about it was off for me...I couldn't put my finger on it. But it is a fave picture of many of my pals, so I think I'll just move on.
But what was my annoyance? That most of the men who attended the Oscars were dressed badly. 1) I'm tired of the fact that many of them were wearing tuxedoes that were ill tailored...their jackets tended to be too tight, and their pants were too long. 2) I'm also tired of people wearing formal wear that looks like business wear. All the standard collars and ties, combined with tuxedo jackets that have standard lapels and pants without the side stripes. This is at least a black tie occasion (if not white tie looking at what the women are wearing). Where are bow ties? Where are the wing tip collars? Where is something formal? 3) There is a way of doing the casual thing in a way that looks stylish...it usually involves wearing an interesting colored shirt...there were sadly very few non-white shirts in attendance. Just lots of boring ill-fitting pseudo-tuxedos, with a four-in-hand knot under a standard collar. 4) There were very few bow ties in attendance and way too many of them were the pre-tied variety. A pre-tied bow tie...especially the sort I saw too often at Oscars...sticks out like a sore thumb and doesn't look very good.
Overall, I dislike that women are expected to go all out to look really good at fancy dress occasions, and the men are able to get away will looking like they spent no care at all on their appearance...or are only phoning their fashion in.
Why does this bother me? Because I think it's related to sexism where women are expected to be the objects of the male gaze, but men are subjects...and being subject means not calling attention to oneself. And secondly, as a man who does care about my appearance and trying to take care...I'm annoyed that in US standards this must automatically make me homosexual. Which feeds back into some weird homophobia that places gay men in a feminized position as the object of the male gaze. Maybe I should get a job in Europe after I get my PhD.
I only want to say the following. I watched the Oscars with the Gang (the school gang) last night. I don't know how I feel about Crash winning the Best Picture Oscar...since I haven't seen it yet. Brokeback was good, but I didn't think it was the most brilliant picture ever...something about it was off for me...I couldn't put my finger on it. But it is a fave picture of many of my pals, so I think I'll just move on.
But what was my annoyance? That most of the men who attended the Oscars were dressed badly. 1) I'm tired of the fact that many of them were wearing tuxedoes that were ill tailored...their jackets tended to be too tight, and their pants were too long. 2) I'm also tired of people wearing formal wear that looks like business wear. All the standard collars and ties, combined with tuxedo jackets that have standard lapels and pants without the side stripes. This is at least a black tie occasion (if not white tie looking at what the women are wearing). Where are bow ties? Where are the wing tip collars? Where is something formal? 3) There is a way of doing the casual thing in a way that looks stylish...it usually involves wearing an interesting colored shirt...there were sadly very few non-white shirts in attendance. Just lots of boring ill-fitting pseudo-tuxedos, with a four-in-hand knot under a standard collar. 4) There were very few bow ties in attendance and way too many of them were the pre-tied variety. A pre-tied bow tie...especially the sort I saw too often at Oscars...sticks out like a sore thumb and doesn't look very good.
Overall, I dislike that women are expected to go all out to look really good at fancy dress occasions, and the men are able to get away will looking like they spent no care at all on their appearance...or are only phoning their fashion in.
Why does this bother me? Because I think it's related to sexism where women are expected to be the objects of the male gaze, but men are subjects...and being subject means not calling attention to oneself. And secondly, as a man who does care about my appearance and trying to take care...I'm annoyed that in US standards this must automatically make me homosexual. Which feeds back into some weird homophobia that places gay men in a feminized position as the object of the male gaze. Maybe I should get a job in Europe after I get my PhD.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-06 09:50 pm (UTC)Noooooooo! Then I couldn't game with you any more!
Seriously, though, I agree with you. Sartorial statements in male fashion are lamentably few and far between. Not that I don't fall for the trap of pre-packaged fashion myself, but my ultimate desire is to have enough money to walk into a tailor's shop and tell them to go to town.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-06 11:15 pm (UTC)And wouldn't it be great to be able to get lots of tailored clothing? A desire of mine as well. That and detacheable collars. Okay, no Europe.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-06 11:27 pm (UTC)Estrella was pretty darn good for me. It wasn't so great for
Detachable collars! Yes! And French cuffs! And silk knots! And hand-painted ties! And...and...and... oh, the list could go on and on...
Seriously off topic...
Date: 2006-03-06 10:02 pm (UTC)I was excited to see the Scooby post you had up earlier, and dissappointed that you took it down or filtered it. I'd never seen anyone else besides me try to use it to describe the dynamics of a particular RPG.
If you put it back up, please send me the URL, and I'll link to it from the Samples page.
Thanks so much.
Re: Seriously off topic...
Date: 2006-03-06 11:10 pm (UTC)By the way, I hope you don't mind, but I've freinded you.
Re: Seriously off topic...
Date: 2006-03-07 03:03 am (UTC)Be forewarned, though. I friend and unfriend based on how much time my f-list takes to read. If I drop you at some point, please don't take it personally.
(BTW - I'm flattered that you like the page so much!)
Not so off topic
Date: 2006-03-06 10:06 pm (UTC)However, you're right. Modern day mens formal wear lacks a great deal.
Re: Not so off topic
Date: 2006-03-06 11:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-06 11:55 pm (UTC)That's my main gripe with Crash. Crash ties everything into neat little bows and yo feel better about racism after watching it. You see some pig feel a woman up on a traffic stop because he hates african americans and then later on you see her crying in his arms. It came around full circle where Brokeback did not.
I hated Morgan Freeman's Ascot, I felt terrible for Jake's poorly (or prepackaged) bow tie. But what the fuck was Charlize Theron wearing? Some sort of cloth parrot?
no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 12:29 am (UTC)As for Crash...I'm just going to have to see it and see if I like it or if it annoys me...either one could happen.
As for the fashion...Morgan Freeman's Ascot was a poor choice. He's not sipping Mai-Tais on a boat...he is at the Oscars. If he wanted to rock the ascot, he needed a closed collar, a brocade vest, and a different coat. Jake's bow tie was bad...but not as bas as Morgan Freeman's ascot...and Larry McMurtry's awful outfit...as for Charlize Theron's parrot outfit? I just don't know what to say. I also don't know what to say about Jessica Alba wearing a dress that seemed to be the same shade as her skin.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-08 07:07 pm (UTC)Maybe that's your issue with it, too?
no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 01:00 am (UTC)